Solutions
All Resources
Discover "Me" · Work Personality
THE AI COACH THAT ACTUALLY GETS YOU.
Voice or text coaching built on psychology. For you, your team, or the candidates you place.
Hey Compono!
A coach that actually gets you.
Get 10 minutes free, then $15 a month. Cancel anytime.
Get Started ≫Written
communication performance review phrases
24 phrases across four rating bands, for managers, coaching conversations and self-evaluations. Filter, copy, print. Free, no sign-up.
Start with the rating band that matches the person, then pick the voice you are writing in. Copy a phrase, then change the specifics so it names the real project, the real quarter, the real thing that happened. A comment that could describe anyone is the thing you were trying to avoid.
How these were written, and the five steps to a review that holds up ↓Writes documents that get decisions made rather than meetings scheduled.
Manager to employeeExplains technical work in writing to a non-technical audience without losing the substance.
Manager to employeeTheir documents are reused by other people, which is the practical test of whether writing is good.
Manager to employeeWorth turning one of their documents into the team template.
CoachingReady to own the writing that goes to the board or to customers.
CoachingI rewrote [document] so the recommendation was in the first three lines, and it was approved without a meeting.
Self-evaluationWriting is clear, correctly structured and appropriate to its audience.
Manager to employeeProofreads before sending, so errors are rare.
Manager to employeeAdjusts length and detail to the reader rather than writing the same way for everybody.
Manager to employeeClear writing. The next step is shorter writing: the same content at half the length is a different skill.
CoachingWorth leading every document with the decision or the ask. Structure is where most of the improvement is left.
CoachingI have started putting the ask in the first paragraph, which has noticeably cut the follow-up questions.
Self-evaluationDocuments open with background, so the reader reaches the point late or not at all.
Manager to employeeLength is not adjusted to the audience, and senior readers are not getting through them.
Manager to employeeErrors in written work reach external audiences.
Manager to employeeWrite the last paragraph first and put it at the top. That single change fixes most of this.
CoachingCut every document by a third before sending. Almost nothing is lost and the point gets found.
CoachingI write the way I think rather than the way somebody reads, so the point ends up at the bottom.
Self-evaluationMy documents are longer than they need to be and I know which parts I am reluctant to cut.
Self-evaluationWritten work has required substantial rewriting by others on multiple occasions after being raised in [month].
Manager to employeeErrors in documents have reached clients or leadership more than once this year.
Manager to employeeFor the next six weeks I want to review documents before they go out, alongside a structure template to work from.
CoachingIf writing has never been part of your training, say so, because that is a solvable gap and worth naming rather than working around.
CoachingMy written work has needed rewriting too often. I want a template and a review step rather than working it out each time.
Self-evaluationRate structure over polish. A well-written document that buries the ask has failed at the only thing it was for.
How these were written
Written, not calculated. Each phrase names a situation, an observable behaviour and its effect on the work or the people around it. Bands run from exceeds expectations to unsatisfactory across three voices: a manager writing about somebody, a manager coaching, and a person writing their own self-evaluation.
- Phrases are starting points. Drop in the real situation or the comment reads as filler.
- The four bands assume a four-point scale. On a three or five-point cycle the band is a sorting device, not a score.
- Written for Australian workplaces and Australian English.
- Check the constraint before rating the person. Workload, authority, tooling and what happened to the last person who tried shape most of what gets written up as an individual failing.
- Unsatisfactory-band comments assume a dated record already exists and the issue has been raised before.
What to do about it
Good phrasing rescues a review that was already done properly. It cannot rescue one where nobody wrote anything down until the week it was due.
Start from your notes, not from this list
Open what you recorded during the year, pick what really happened, then find the wording. The other order produces a fluent review that says nothing.
Name the situation in every comment
The real project, the real quarter, the real result. Only one person could have earned it.
Match the band to your evidence, not the conversation you want
A generous rating on somebody you privately consider a problem is how next year's difficult conversation ends up looking like it came from nowhere.
Pair every development comment with a support step
Training, a pilot, a pairing, a cadence. Criticism without a path forward produces defensiveness and reads badly to anyone reviewing the file later.
Read your reviews as a set
If the same competency is the gap across a function, that is a capability gap in how the team was built rather than a dozen development plans.
Put the last paragraph
at the top.
Compono Develop maps capability against what a role actually requires, so a writing gap becomes a specific, trainable thing rather than a comment somebody cannot act on.
Step 5 asks what your reviews say together. That is very hard to answer from a folder of review documents and straightforward to answer from capability data.
Common questions
What are examples of written communication feedback?
Documents that get decisions made rather than meetings scheduled, explaining technical work without losing the substance, writing that other people reuse.
How do you help someone write better at work?
Two changes fix most of it: put the last paragraph first, and cut the whole thing by a third.
Can I use these phrases word for word?
Yes, with the real document named.
Next step
Competency framework
The bands above are competency ratings. This is what a competency framework is, and how the levels are meant to work.
Read the definition →Related toolTraining ROI calculator
Reviews name the gap one person at a time. This one sizes it across the team.
Run it next →BuyingRequirements builder
Score the platforms you are looking at against the two risks, must-haves first.
Build the scorecard →Talk to usBring us your review cycle
A conversation about what your reviews are telling you as a set, not a demo script.
Talk to us →.webp?width=559&height=292&name=2026.07.21%20Fireside%20KV%20-%201200x627%20(event%20featured).webp)
.png?width=383&height=200&name=team%20(1).png)