Skip to the main content.

Hey Compono!

A coach that actually gets you.

Get 10 minutes free, then $15 a month. Cancel anytime.

Get Started ≫
Free tools for HR leaders

Written
communication performance review phrases

24 phrases across four rating bands, for managers, coaching conversations and self-evaluations. Filter, copy, print. Free, no sign-up.

Start with the rating band that matches the person, then pick the voice you are writing in. Copy a phrase, then change the specifics so it names the real project, the real quarter, the real thing that happened. A comment that could describe anyone is the thing you were trying to avoid.

How these were written, and the five steps to a review that holds up ↓
Rating:
Voice:
24 showing
Exceeds expectations

Writes documents that get decisions made rather than meetings scheduled.

Manager to employee

Explains technical work in writing to a non-technical audience without losing the substance.

Manager to employee

Their documents are reused by other people, which is the practical test of whether writing is good.

Manager to employee

Worth turning one of their documents into the team template.

Coaching

Ready to own the writing that goes to the board or to customers.

Coaching

I rewrote [document] so the recommendation was in the first three lines, and it was approved without a meeting.

Self-evaluation
Meets expectations

Writing is clear, correctly structured and appropriate to its audience.

Manager to employee

Proofreads before sending, so errors are rare.

Manager to employee

Adjusts length and detail to the reader rather than writing the same way for everybody.

Manager to employee

Clear writing. The next step is shorter writing: the same content at half the length is a different skill.

Coaching

Worth leading every document with the decision or the ask. Structure is where most of the improvement is left.

Coaching

I have started putting the ask in the first paragraph, which has noticeably cut the follow-up questions.

Self-evaluation
Needs development

Documents open with background, so the reader reaches the point late or not at all.

Manager to employee

Length is not adjusted to the audience, and senior readers are not getting through them.

Manager to employee

Errors in written work reach external audiences.

Manager to employee

Write the last paragraph first and put it at the top. That single change fixes most of this.

Coaching

Cut every document by a third before sending. Almost nothing is lost and the point gets found.

Coaching

I write the way I think rather than the way somebody reads, so the point ends up at the bottom.

Self-evaluation

My documents are longer than they need to be and I know which parts I am reluctant to cut.

Self-evaluation
Unsatisfactory

Written work has required substantial rewriting by others on multiple occasions after being raised in [month].

Manager to employee

Errors in documents have reached clients or leadership more than once this year.

Manager to employee

For the next six weeks I want to review documents before they go out, alongside a structure template to work from.

Coaching

If writing has never been part of your training, say so, because that is a solvable gap and worth naming rather than working around.

Coaching

My written work has needed rewriting too often. I want a template and a review step rather than working it out each time.

Self-evaluation
No phrases match those two filters together. Clear one of them.
How do you write about written communication in a performance review?

Rate structure over polish. A well-written document that buries the ask has failed at the only thing it was for.

How these were written

Written, not calculated. Each phrase names a situation, an observable behaviour and its effect on the work or the people around it. Bands run from exceeds expectations to unsatisfactory across three voices: a manager writing about somebody, a manager coaching, and a person writing their own self-evaluation.

Assumptions
  • Phrases are starting points. Drop in the real situation or the comment reads as filler.
  • The four bands assume a four-point scale. On a three or five-point cycle the band is a sorting device, not a score.
  • Written for Australian workplaces and Australian English.
  • Check the constraint before rating the person. Workload, authority, tooling and what happened to the last person who tried shape most of what gets written up as an individual failing.
  • Unsatisfactory-band comments assume a dated record already exists and the issue has been raised before.

What to do about it

Good phrasing rescues a review that was already done properly. It cannot rescue one where nobody wrote anything down until the week it was due.

1

Start from your notes, not from this list

Open what you recorded during the year, pick what really happened, then find the wording. The other order produces a fluent review that says nothing.

2

Name the situation in every comment

The real project, the real quarter, the real result. Only one person could have earned it.

3

Match the band to your evidence, not the conversation you want

A generous rating on somebody you privately consider a problem is how next year's difficult conversation ends up looking like it came from nowhere.

4

Pair every development comment with a support step

Training, a pilot, a pairing, a cadence. Criticism without a path forward produces defensiveness and reads badly to anyone reviewing the file later.

5
Where a tool helps

Read your reviews as a set

If the same competency is the gap across a function, that is a capability gap in how the team was built rather than a dozen development plans.

Put the last paragraph
at the top.

Compono Develop maps capability against what a role actually requires, so a writing gap becomes a specific, trainable thing rather than a comment somebody cannot act on.

Step 5 asks what your reviews say together. That is very hard to answer from a folder of review documents and straightforward to answer from capability data.

See how it works
Compono Develop
4.7/5
rating across millions of learners

Common questions

What are examples of written communication feedback?

Documents that get decisions made rather than meetings scheduled, explaining technical work without losing the substance, writing that other people reuse.

How do you help someone write better at work?

Two changes fix most of it: put the last paragraph first, and cut the whole thing by a third.

Can I use these phrases word for word?

Yes, with the real document named.

These phrases are starting points, not finished comments. Change the specifics so each one is true of the actual person and the actual situation, because a comment that could describe anyone is the thing you were trying to avoid. Review comments can later be read as evidence in an employment matter, so anything you take from the unsatisfactory band should match a dated record you already hold. Last reviewed July 2026.