Skip to the main content.
Talk to an expert
Talk to an expert
Featured Offer
Ambitious 50 →
6 months of Hire and Engage free for businesses under 50 people.

Hey Compono!

A coach that actually gets you.

Get 10 minutes free, then $15 a month. Cancel anytime.

Get Started ≫
Free tools for HR leaders

Critical
thinking performance review phrases

24 phrases across four rating bands, for managers, coaching conversations and self-evaluations. Filter, copy, print. Free, no sign-up.

Start with the rating band that matches the person, then pick the voice you are writing in. Copy a phrase, then change the specifics so it names the real project, the real quarter, the real thing that happened. A comment that could describe anyone is the thing you were trying to avoid.

How these were written, and the five steps to a review that holds up ↓
Rating:
Voice:
24 showing
Exceeds expectations

Questions the premise of a request when the premise is wrong, and does it early enough to be useful.

Manager to employee

Distinguishes what the data shows from what people want it to show, including when that is unwelcome.

Manager to employee

Changed their own position on [decision] when the evidence moved, and said so publicly.

Manager to employee

Worth putting them in the room earlier. The value is in the framing, and by delivery stage most of it has been spent.

Coaching

Ready to review other people's reasoning, not only produce their own.

Coaching

I pushed back on the brief for [work] because it was answering the wrong question, and the revised version was substantially better.

Self-evaluation
Meets expectations

Tests assumptions before building on them.

Manager to employee

Separates evidence from opinion in their recommendations.

Manager to employee

Asks what would have to be true for a plan to work.

Manager to employee

Sound reasoning on their own work. The next step is applying it to somebody else's proposal in a meeting.

Coaching

Worth stating the strongest argument against your own recommendation when you present it. It builds trust faster than confidence does.

Coaching

I have started writing down what would have to be true for a plan to work, which has killed two ideas early and cheaply.

Self-evaluation
Needs development

Accepts briefs as given, including ones with obvious gaps.

Manager to employee

Presents conclusions without the reasoning, so they are hard to check or challenge.

Manager to employee

Tends to find evidence that supports a position already taken.

Manager to employee

Before accepting a brief, ask what problem it is trying to solve. A surprising number do not survive that question.

Coaching

Show your reasoning, not just your answer. An answer nobody can check is one nobody can back you on.

Coaching

I take briefs at face value more than I should, and I have built on assumptions I never tested.

Self-evaluation

I want to get better at arguing against my own conclusion before presenting it.

Self-evaluation
Unsatisfactory

Recommendations have been made without supporting analysis on multiple occasions, including [example].

Manager to employee

Significant flaws in [work] were not identified despite being visible in the source material.

Manager to employee

For the next three recommendations I need the reasoning written out: what you assumed, what you checked, what would change your mind. Reviewed in six weeks.

Coaching

If the pressure is to produce answers quickly rather than correctly, say so, because that is mine to change.

Coaching

I have produced conclusions without enough analysis behind them. I want the expectation on rigour stated explicitly.

Self-evaluation
No phrases match those two filters together. Clear one of them.
How do you describe critical thinking in a performance review?

Rate whether the reasoning was visible and whether it held. An answer nobody can check is one nobody can back you on.

How these were written

Written, not calculated. Each phrase names a situation, an observable behaviour and its effect on the work or the people around it. Bands run from exceeds expectations to unsatisfactory across three voices: a manager writing about somebody, a manager coaching, and a person writing their own self-evaluation.

Assumptions
  • Phrases are starting points. Drop in the real situation or the comment reads as filler.
  • The four bands assume a four-point scale. On a three or five-point cycle the band is a sorting device, not a score.
  • Written for Australian workplaces and Australian English.
  • Check the constraint before rating the person. Workload, authority and prior experience shape most of what gets written up as an individual failing.
  • Unsatisfactory-band comments assume a dated record already exists and the issue has been raised before.
Sources

What to do about it

Good phrasing rescues a review that was already done properly. It cannot rescue one where nobody wrote anything down until the week it was due.

1

Start from your notes, not from this list

Open what you recorded during the year, pick what really happened, then find the wording. The other order produces a fluent review that says nothing.

2

Name the situation in every comment

The real project, the real quarter, the real result. Only one person could have earned it.

3

Match the band to your evidence, not the conversation you want

A generous rating on somebody you privately consider a problem is how next year's difficult conversation ends up looking like it came from nowhere.

4

Pair every development comment with a support step

Training, a pilot, a pairing, a cadence. Criticism without a path forward produces defensiveness and reads badly to anyone reviewing the file later.

5
Where a tool helps

Read your reviews as a set

If the same competency is the gap across a function, that is a capability gap in how the team was built rather than a dozen development plans.

Confidence is not
the same as evidence.

Compono Develop maps what a role actually requires against what people can currently do, so reasoning gaps become a development plan rather than a debate about how somebody comes across.

Step 5 asks what your reviews say together. That is very hard to answer from a folder of review documents and straightforward to answer from capability data.

See how it works
Compono Develop
4.7/5
rating across millions of learners

Common questions

What are examples of critical thinking feedback?

Questioning a brief that was answering the wrong question, separating evidence from opinion, changing a position publicly when the data moved.

How do you develop critical thinking in someone?

Ask for the reasoning, not just the answer, every time. Then ask what would have to be true for it to be wrong.

Is critical thinking the same as problem solving?

They overlap. Problem solving is rated on what happened to a specific issue; critical thinking on the quality of the reasoning regardless of outcome.

These phrases are starting points, not finished comments. Change the specifics so each one is true of the actual person and the actual situation, because a comment that could describe anyone is the thing you were trying to avoid. Review comments can later be read as evidence in an employment matter, so anything you take from the unsatisfactory band should match a dated record you already hold. Last reviewed July 2026.

Next step

HR Glossary

Competency framework

The bands above are competency ratings. This is what a competency framework is, and how the levels are meant to work.

Read the definition →Related tool

Skills gap analysis calculator

Reviews name the gap one person at a time. This one sizes it across the team.

Run it next →Buying

Requirements builder

Score the platforms you are looking at against the two risks, must-haves first.

Build the scorecard →Talk to us

Bring us your review cycle

A conversation about what your reviews are telling you as a set, not a demo script.

Talk to us →