Best ELMO alternatives for modern HR and talent management
Choosing the right HR software can feel like a high-stakes puzzle, especially when your current system starts to feel more like a digital filing...
Become the expert on delivering
valid and fair assessments for
your training and education.
Hire
|
Engage
|
Develop
|
|
Automatically match to candidates who are a great fit for your team culture and who are intrinsically motivated to succeed. |
Deeply understand your organisation with science-backed analytics on your culture, team design, and engagement. |
Back your onboarding, compliance and skill development with industry-leading credentialling, competency and capability expertise.
|
Hey Compono helps you understand your personality and how to turn it into your superpower.
First 1,000 users get 10 minutes free.
Just $15 a month after that — cancel anytime.
Managing a talent acquisition strategy when you are faced with a literal tsunami of applicants can feel like trying to catch a waterfall in a thimble. In today's workplace, the problem isn't usually a lack of interest; it is the overwhelming volume of noise that makes finding the right person for your team feel nearly impossible.
We have all been there. You post a role on a Tuesday morning, and by Wednesday afternoon, you have three hundred notifications sitting in your inbox from six different job boards. Your morning coffee goes cold while you stare at a screen full of resumes that all start to look the same after the first fifty. It is a classic case of quantity over quality, and without the right approach, your best candidates – those rare 'high-signal' individuals – are likely to get washed away in the flood.
The current hiring market has shifted dramatically. A few years ago, we talked about talent shortages and the 'war for talent.' While specific technical skills remain highly sought after, the barrier to entry for applying to a job has never been lower. With one-click applications and automated job-seeking bots becoming standard tools for applicants, the sheer number of people hitting the 'apply' button has skyrocketed. This explosion in volume has created a new kind of pressure for human resources teams and business owners alike.
When you are recruiting in 2026, you aren't just competing with other companies for the best people; you are competing with the limitations of your own time. If it takes you two minutes to scan each resume and you have five hundred applicants, that is over sixteen hours of pure reading before you have even picked up the phone. Most of us simply don't have that kind of bandwidth. This leads to 'resume fatigue,' where your brain naturally starts looking for reasons to say 'no' just to clear the pile, rather than looking for reasons to say 'yes.'
The danger here is obvious. When we are overwhelmed, we rely on shortcuts. We look for familiar company names or specific university degrees because they are easy to spot. But these are often poor predictors of actual on-the-job performance. By relying on these 'lazy' metrics, we often overlook the 'Doer' or the 'Pioneer' who has the exact work personality we need but didn't follow a traditional career path. To fix this, we need to move beyond traditional applicant tracking and toward systems of intelligence.
If the first problem is volume, the second is fragmentation. To cast a wide net, you likely post your roles on LinkedIn, Seek, Indeed, and perhaps a few niche industry boards. Each of these platforms has its own dashboard, its own notification system, and its own way of formatting candidate data. Navigating between these tabs is a productivity killer that fragments your focus and makes it difficult to compare candidates side-by-side.
You need a way to bring all these disparate streams of data into a single, unified centre. This isn't just about convenience; it is about objective assessment. When candidates are presented in different formats, our brains subconsciously assign more value to the one that is easiest to read. A beautifully formatted LinkedIn profile might outshine a plain text resume from a local job board, even if the latter candidate has superior skills. Standardising how you view your applicants is the first step toward removing bias from your talent acquisition process.
At Compono, we believe the world doesn't need another system of record that just stores data; it needs a system of intelligence that understands it. By using a platform that aggregates all your sourcing channels into one place, you can apply a consistent set of criteria to every single person who expresses interest. This concept of a 'centralised talent pool' is a core feature of Compono Hire, which allows you to see every candidate through the same lens, regardless of where they found your ad.
Once you have everyone in one place, the real work begins: the screening. For decades, recruiters have relied on keyword matching. If the job description says 'Project Management' and the resume says 'Project Management,' it is a match, right? Not necessarily. Keywords are easily gamed, and they tell you nothing about a person's competence, motivation, or cultural alignment. In a high-volume environment, keyword searching is a blunt instrument that often fails to find the sharpest talent.
To truly see the good ones, you need to assess candidates on multiple levels simultaneously. This includes their technical skills, their qualifications, and – most importantly – their organisational suitability. We know from years of organisational psychology research that skills can be taught, but a person's underlying work motivations and personality are much harder to change. If you hire someone with the right skills but the wrong work personality for the team, they will likely become part of your turnover statistics within twelve months.
This is where predictive matching becomes your best friend. Instead of you doing the manual filtering, a smart engine can rank candidates based on how well they fit your specific requirements. This doesn't replace the human element; it empowers it. By having a ranked list of the best matches ready before you even open a resume, you can focus your energy on the top 10% of the pool. Compono Hire uses this exact science-backed approach to rank every applicant on how well they align with your business and team, making it much easier to handle recruiting in 2026.
Even with advanced technology doing the heavy lifting, the final decision always rests with you. However, the 'human filter' works much better when it isn't exhausted. When you are only looking at a shortlist of thirty highly-matched candidates instead of a raw pile of five hundred, you can afford to be more thorough. You can look for 'high-signal' indicators that a machine might miss, such as the nuances in their cover letter or the progression of responsibilities in their career history.
One of the most effective ways to identify top talent is to look at their work personality. In our experience, teams thrive when they have a balance of different types. For example, a team full of 'Doers' will be incredibly productive but might lack the creative spark of a 'Pioneer' or the analytical rigour of an 'Auditor.' When you are reviewing your shortlist, consider not just if the candidate can do the job, but how they will complement the existing personalities in your team. You can learn more about these types on our work personality page.
A 'high-signal' candidate is someone whose motivations align perfectly with the role. If the job requires high levels of collaboration and the candidate is a 'Helper' who gets their energy from supporting others, that is a strong signal for long-term success. On the other hand, if the role is highly structured and repetitive, but the candidate is a 'Campaigner' who needs constant innovation and networking, they might be a brilliant person who is simply in the wrong role. Spotting these misalignments early saves everyone a lot of heartache later on.
As we look toward the future of work, the trend of high-volume applications is unlikely to reverse. To stay competitive, your talent acquisition tech stack must be able to handle 1,000+ applications per role without breaking your workflow. A traditional Applicant Tracking System (ATS) that simply acts as a digital filing cabinet is no longer enough. You need a platform that actively helps you make decisions.
A modern tech stack should offer three things: automation of administrative tasks, intelligent screening, and a seamless candidate experience. If your application process is too long or clunky, your best candidates – who likely have other options – will drop out of the funnel. Conversely, if it is too easy, you get the tsunami of low-quality apps. The 'sweet spot' is a process that is easy to start but includes a meaningful assessment component that filters for intent and fit early on.
By flipping the traditional hiring model – putting assessments and intelligent ranking at the front of the process rather than the end – you ensure that your time is always spent on the right people. This is the philosophy behind the Compono Hire platform. It allows you to cast a wide net across a thousand job boards, capture everyone in one place, and then use people science to tell you exactly who you should talk to first. It turns a chaotic day-in-the-life of a recruiter into an organised, data-driven operation.
To maintain fairness and efficiency when managing hundreds of applicants, you need an objective scoring framework. Without one, your hiring decisions become subject to the 'recency effect' (remembering the last resume you saw) or the 'halo effect' (letting one good trait overshadow several red flags). An objective framework ensures that every candidate is measured against the same yardstick.
This framework should weigh different factors based on their importance to the specific role. For a senior leadership position, you might place a 60% weighting on organisational culture fit and leadership personality, and a 40% weighting on technical experience. For a junior technical role, those weightings might be reversed. The point is that these weightings should be determined before you start looking at candidates, not while you are in the middle of it.
Using these frameworks allows you to generate a 'Quality-over-Quantity' scorecard. Instead of just seeing a name and a resume, you see a score that represents their alignment with your business goals. This makes it much easier to 'report up' to senior leadership and justify why certain candidates are moving forward. It transforms recruitment from a subjective 'gut feel' exercise into a strategic business function that is based on evidence and best practice.
One of the biggest casualties of high-volume hiring is the candidate experience. When a recruiter is managing 500 applications, they often don't have the time to send personalised rejections or even simple status updates. This leads to the 'black hole' of recruitment, where candidates feel ignored and disrespected. In a world where your employer brand is a key part of your competitive advantage, this is a significant risk.
Automation can actually make your hiring process feel more human, not less. By using automated but warm and personalised communication at key stages of the funnel, you keep candidates informed without adding hours to your workday. Even a simple automated email letting a candidate know they haven't been successful this time – but explaining why fit is so important to you – can leave a positive impression. You never know when an unsuccessful applicant today might be the perfect fit for a different role in the future.
A positive candidate experience also involves respecting their time. If your initial application takes forty minutes to complete, you will lose high-quality talent. If you use a streamlined initial application followed by a targeted assessment for those who pass the first gate, you demonstrate that you value their effort. This balanced approach ensures you maintain a healthy talent pool while still getting the data you need to make great hires.
As we rely more on technology to help us filter candidates, we must be vigilant about AI bias. If an algorithm is trained on historical data from a company that has only ever hired one type of person, the AI will naturally learn to prioritise that same type, perpetuating a lack of diversity. This is a challenge that all modern talent acquisition teams must address.
The solution is to use 'explainable' AI and assessments grounded in validated academic research rather than just historical hiring patterns. At Compono, our models are designed to measure underlying human attributes that are universal, rather than surface-level keywords that might be biased by gender, age, or background. We focus on 'Inside Out' data – a person's true self – rather than 'Outside In' data like where they went to school.
By focusing on work personality and cultural alignment, you naturally build more diverse teams. You start to see the value in the 'Coordinator' or the 'Helper' who might have been overlooked by a traditional keyword search but is exactly what your team culture needs to reach its next performance milestone. This approach ensures that your pursuit of efficiency doesn't come at the cost of equity.
Imagine a recruiter who starts their day not by dreading their inbox, but by opening a dashboard that has already done the first round of interviews for them. While they were sleeping, the system collected applicants from four job boards, parsed their resumes into a standard format, and invited them to complete a short, engaging fit assessment. By 9:00 AM, the recruiter has a ranked list of the top twenty candidates who are not only qualified but are highly likely to thrive in the company culture.
Instead of 'fishing' through resumes, they spend their morning having high-quality conversations with people who are already a 90% match for the role. Because the administrative tasks like scheduling and initial screening are automated, they have time to deep-dive into the candidate's motivations. They can act as a 'strategic coach' to the hiring manager, explaining not just that a candidate is good, but why their specific work personality will help the team overcome its current challenges.
This is the reality of recruiting in 2026 when you use the right tools. It moves the HR function from a cost centre focused on process to a strategic partner focused on growth. It allows you to handle the application tsunami with ease, ensuring that you never miss a great hire just because they were at the bottom of a pile of five hundred resumes.
Choosing the right HR software can feel like a high-stakes puzzle, especially when your current system starts to feel more like a digital filing...
Choosing the right applicant tracking system is one of the most critical decisions you will make for your business growth, yet many teams find...
Finding the right person for a job in the Australian market has never been harder than it is right now in 2026. While the talent landscape has...