Skip to the main content.

3 min read

Best alternatives to Workable for modern hiring teams

Best alternatives to Workable for modern hiring teams

Why teams look for a Workable alternative

Workable is a genuinely popular ATS, and for good reason: it launches fast, posts everywhere and keeps pipelines tidy. The reason teams go looking elsewhere is rarely the workflow. It's that a tidy process kept producing wrong hires, because keyword screening on CVs can't see who will actually succeed in the team.

Quick answer

  • Workable's price: US$299 a month on Standard for 1 to 20 employees, billed annually, rising with headcount.
  • Best alternatives: Compono Hire if wrong hires are the problem; Greenhouse for structured hiring at scale; Lever for sourcing-led teams that need a candidate relationship management (CRM) tool; JobAdder for ANZ agencies.
  • Verdict: Most of these publish no price. Ask each vendor for a written quote at your headcount and compare year-one cost, not the monthly headline.

Last reviewed October 2026. Prices checked on 18 October 2026 on each vendor's pricing page, or with the third-party source named. Figures are in US dollars unless marked.

AlternativePublished priceSource
Compono HireA$5.5k to A$6.5k a year for one product under 100 employees (AUD, ex GST, published)Compono pricing page
GreenhouseQuote only; Vendr median US$26,570 a yearVendr, 884 purchases
LeverQuote only; Vendr median US$15,400 a yearVendr, 318 purchases
SmartRecruitersEssential plan "starting at $14,995" (billing period not stated)SmartRecruiters pricing page
TeamtailorQuote onlyTeamtailor pricing page
PinpointQuote onlyPinpoint pricing page
JobAdderQuote only; agency plans by user countJobAdder pricing page

Disclosure: Compono makes Hire, an applicant tracking system (ATS), so we compete with some of the tools in this table. Our own prices are public on our pricing page.

Disclosure: Compono builds one of the tools on this list. The entries are factual, we say who each tool genuinely fits, and we tell you when ours is not the right pick.

Workable alternatives at a glance

ToolBest for
Compono HireCulture and work-personality fit measured on every candidate
GreenhouseStructured hiring process at scale
LeverSourcing-led teams with CRM needs
SmartRecruitersEnterprise, multi-country hiring
TeamtailorEmployer-brand-led hiring
PinpointSupported mid-market ATS
JobAdderANZ agencies and staffing teams

The best Workable alternatives in 2026

1. Compono Hire

The full ATS workflow (requisitions, advertising, pipelines, scheduling) with the difference underneath: every candidate is assessed for work personality and organisation fit against the culture you've actually measured, so shortlists rank on evidence rather than keywords.

Best for: Mid-market teams (roughly 60-1,000 staff) where hiring outcomes matter commercially.
See the detail: how Compono compares head-to-head.

2. Greenhouse

The structured-interviewing heavyweight. Greenhouse gives scaling companies a disciplined, repeatable hiring process with scorecards, interview kits and serious reporting, and its integration marketplace is one of the deepest in the category.

Best for: Scale-ups and enterprises that want hiring process rigour.
Worth checking: Enterprise pricing and setup effort; candidates are structured, not assessed for fit. Read the full Compono vs Greenhouse comparison.

3. Lever

A pure-play ATS with a built-in CRM, so proactive sourcing and nurture live in the same tool as your pipeline. Clean interface, strong analytics, popular with in-house talent teams.

Best for: Sourcing-led teams that treat hiring like a sales pipeline.
Worth checking: Fit still comes down to CVs and interviews; pricing is quote-based. Read the full Compono vs Lever comparison.

4. SmartRecruiters

An enterprise talent-acquisition suite, now part of SAP, with a marketplace of add-ons and serious global hiring capability.

Best for: Large organisations running high-volume, multi-country hiring.
Worth checking: Heavier than most mid-market teams need; assessment comes via add-ons. Read the full Compono vs SmartRecruiters comparison.

5. Teamtailor

An employer-branding-led ATS with a polished careers-site builder and a candidate experience teams are proud to show off.

Best for: Brand-conscious teams where the careers page does heavy lifting.
Worth checking: Light on assessment depth behind the good looks. Read the full Compono vs Teamtailor comparison.

6. Pinpoint

A mid-market ATS known for attentive support and sensible workflows, with strong in-house recruitment features.

Best for: In-house teams that want an ATS partner rather than a portal.
Worth checking: Smaller ecosystem than the big global players.

7. JobAdder

An ANZ favourite, especially with recruitment agencies. Workflow-first design, solid job-board integrations and a local support footprint.

Best for: Agencies and staffing teams working at placement speed.
Worth checking: Built for workflow throughput, not candidate insight. Read the full Compono vs JobAdder comparison.

How to choose

Pick on the problem, not the feature list. If your bottleneck is process, most tools above solve it. If your problem is that good-looking candidates keep not working out, the fix is assessment, and only some of these measure fit at all. Our guide to ATS vs HRIS hiring covers the wider decision.

See exactly how the two compare on Compono vs Workable, or talk to us for a straight answer on fit.

Frequently asked questions

Is Workable a good ATS?

Yes. It's fast to deploy, well-integrated and fairly priced. The gap is candidate insight: screening leans on keywords and CV history rather than measured fit, which is the usual reason teams outgrow it.

What should I look for in a Workable alternative?

Decide whether you're fixing workflow or fixing hiring outcomes. For workflow, compare pipelines, integrations and pricing. For outcomes, look for validated assessment of work personality and culture fit built into the flow, not bolted on.

Which Workable alternative is best for Australian teams?

Compono is Australian-built with local support, and JobAdder and Snaphire also have strong ANZ footprints. Global tools work here too; weigh local support and time zones against ecosystem size.

Related

Best candidate management software for modern hiring

Best candidate management software for modern hiring

Candidate management software tracks applicants, runs your pipeline and keeps a talent pool. What to check in 2026, and prices from US$299 a month.

Read More
Greenhouse pricing 2026: Plans, costs, and hidden fees

Greenhouse pricing 2026: Plans, costs, and hidden fees

Greenhouse doesn't publish prices. Vendr data from 884 purchases puts the median at US$26,570 a year (US$10,207 to $74,330). Tiers, fees and what to...

Read More
Best talent acquisition software for modern teams

Best talent acquisition software for modern teams

Talent acquisition software covers sourcing, tracking, assessment and offers. What to check in 2026, prices from US$299 a month, and where fit comes...

Read More