1 min read
12 different employment tests to hire smarter in 2026
Employment tests fall into 12 main types, from cognitive ability and personality assessments through to work samples and situational judgement tests....
7 min read
Mathan Allington
Updated on September 14, 2026
Pre-employment assessment is the structured testing an employer runs before making an offer, covering skills, reasoning, work personality and fit with the team, so the decision rests on evidence rather than an impression formed across two interviews. In Australia it normally sits between shortlisting and the final interview, takes a candidate a few minutes per test, and has to be job-related and applied the same way to every applicant.
Last reviewed September 2026.
Pre-employment testing is the same idea under a different name. Recruiters use "assessment" when they mean the whole set of measures attached to a role, and "testing" when they mean one instrument inside it. Nothing hangs on the distinction. What matters is which measures you run, when you run them, and whether you can explain the result to a candidate who asks.
Most Australian hiring processes draw on a handful of test families. They measure different things and they fail in different ways, so the useful question is which two or three answer the open question about this particular role.
| Test type | What it measures | Best used for | Known limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skills and work sample tests | Whether someone can do the actual task, marked against a rubric | Hands-on and technical roles where output is visible | Takes effort to build and mark, and only covers the task you chose |
| Cognitive and reasoning tests | Problem solving, numerical and verbal reasoning under time pressure | Roles with heavy learning curves or complex judgement | Can disadvantage candidates with test anxiety or English as a second language |
| Work personality and preference assessments | How a person prefers to work, decide and collaborate | Team fit, role design and interview planning | Describes preference, not capability, so it never stands alone |
| Situational judgement tests | How someone would respond to realistic scenarios from the role | Customer-facing, safety-critical and frontline leadership roles | Answers can be guessed by candidates who read the employer well |
| Integrity and values questionnaires | Attitudes to rules, safety and accountability | Roles with cash handling, compliance or safety exposure | Self-reported, so results move when candidates feel scrutinised |
| Background, reference and right to work checks | Verified history, identity and entitlement to work | Every role, at offer stage | Confirms the past and predicts very little about performance |
| Medical, functional and physical assessments | Capacity to meet the inherent physical requirements of the job | Trades, transport, healthcare and heavy industry | Must be tied to genuine job requirements and handled with care |
The family that causes the most confusion is the third one. A psychometric assessment is any standardised, scored measure of a psychological attribute, which covers reasoning tests as well as personality questionnaires. Calling all of it "personality testing" is where hiring managers start expecting the wrong thing from the report.
A pre-employment hiring and assessment process has a shape, and running the steps out of order is what makes it expensive. A sequence that holds up looks like this.
Two habits cause most of the damage. Running assessment after the decision has already formed turns it into paperwork that confirms what the panel wanted to hear. Running every available test on every candidate wastes their time and yours, and drives drop-off among exactly the people with options.
Australian recruiters advertise "pre-screened candidates" constantly, and the phrase covers wildly different amounts of work. At the light end it means someone read the resume and confirmed the applicant has the right to work and the years of experience listed in the ad. At the heavier end it means a structured phone screen, a skills check, a verified reference and a work personality profile, with notes you can read.
If you are receiving pre-screened candidates from an agency or an internal team, four questions settle what you are actually being handed. What criteria were applied. Who applied them, and against what rubric. What proportion of applicants were filtered out at each step. What evidence comes with the shortlist. If the answers are vague, the screening was a sort, and the assessment work still sits with you.
Screening and assessment also answer different questions. Screening removes applicants who cannot do the job. Assessment tells you how the remaining people differ from each other, which is the part that decides the hire. A shortlist that arrives with no comparative evidence has done the first job and skipped the second.
Everyone has a preference for how they like to work, and in a team those preferences set the cadence of how work gets done. Compono measures eight of them: Doer, Auditor, Helper, Advisor, Pioneer, Campaigner, Evaluator and Coordinator. Some people take charge and drive to a result, some hold the detail, some carry the relationships, some press on whether the plan is right at all.
Mapping the role to those preferences changes two things. It sharpens the interview, because you know in advance where a candidate is likely to be strong and where to push harder. It also makes team composition visible, so you can see that a team already deep in Auditors and short on Pioneers will execute beautifully and struggle when the market shifts. High-performing teams are rarely made of one type of person. You can read more about how the eight types work on the work personality hub.
Work personality describes preference, so it belongs alongside a skills measure rather than in place of one. A candidate who prefers structure can absolutely do ambiguous work, they will just find it more tiring. That distinction is the difference between using an assessment well and using it as a filter it was never built to be.
Australian anti-discrimination and privacy obligations apply to assessment the same way they apply to interviews. The principles that keep a process defensible are straightforward, even when the detail is not.
This is general information rather than legal advice. Assessment in regulated, safety-critical and government contexts carries extra obligations, so take professional advice on your specific process before you rely on it.
Vendor claims in this category are hard to compare because everybody uses the same vocabulary. Four questions separate the options quickly.
If you are weighing assessment against other ways of getting signal early, the trade-offs are set out in our guide to assessments compared with video interviewing, and the research on whether these measures predict anything at all is covered in does psychometric testing work.
Compono Hire runs skills, culture and work personality together inside the applicant tracking system, so the shortlist arrives with the evidence attached instead of sitting in a separate report nobody opens. It suits teams hiring for fit and retention at volume. If you are filling one specialist role a year, a standalone assessment and a good structured interview will serve you better.
Replacing someone who leaves in the first year is expensive in ways that rarely appear on one budget line. Advertising and agency fees, the time your team spends screening and interviewing, onboarding and training, the output that did not happen while the seat was empty, and the work the rest of the team absorbed in the meantime.
Here is an illustrative example with made-up numbers, to show the shape rather than a benchmark. Take a role on $90,000. If recruitment costs $8,000, onboarding and training take four weeks of a manager's time, and the role sits vacant or unproductive for three months, the direct and indirect cost of doing it twice runs well past the advertising invoice, which is the only number most teams ever see. Our cost of a bad hire calculator lets you put your own figures in rather than borrowing someone else's rule of thumb.
The point of assessing before the contract is signed is that it changes the odds on the expensive outcome. A structured, fair process also reads well to candidates, so the people you do not hire leave with a decent impression of the business.
Compono Hire measures skills, culture and work personality in one candidate flow, so shortlists come with evidence rather than impressions.
Talk to usIt is standardised testing an employer runs before an offer, measuring skills, reasoning, work preferences or fit against the requirements of a specific role. Results are scored the same way for every candidate so applicants can be compared on evidence rather than on how the interview felt.
Skills and work sample tests, cognitive and reasoning tests, work personality and preference assessments, situational judgement tests, integrity questionnaires, background and reference checks, and medical or functional assessments for physically demanding roles. Most employers run two or three, chosen for the role rather than all of them.
Yes, provided each measure is relevant to the inherent requirements of the job, applied consistently to every candidate at that stage, and does not discriminate against protected attributes. Candidates should know what they are completing and be offered reasonable adjustments. Health and medical information carries extra obligations, so seek professional advice on your own process.
Modern assessments are built in minutes rather than hours, and completion rates drop sharply once a candidate is asked for more than about half an hour in total. Keeping it short protects your applicant pool and still produces a usable result.
It means someone has already filtered applicants against defined criteria before you see them, though the depth varies enormously. Ask what criteria were applied, who applied them, how many applicants were removed at each step, and what evidence arrives with the shortlist. Screening removes people who cannot do the job; assessment tells you how the remaining candidates differ.

Compono Hire helps you predict job-fit and team-fit using behavioural science, so you can shortlist with confidence.
Request a demoBuilt for mid-market hiring teams.

Voice-first coaching that adapts to your personality. Get actionable steps you can take this week.
Start freeBuilt by Compono. Not therapy — practical behaviour change.
1 min read
Employment tests fall into 12 main types, from cognitive ability and personality assessments through to work samples and situational judgement tests....
1 min read
Pre-employment assessment in Australia is the use of standardised, validated tools to evaluate a candidate's skills, personality and organisational...
1 min read
Predicting job performance means measuring the things that actually carry across employers: general cognitive ability, work preferences and...