1 min read
Bob performance: a guide to better reviews in 2026
In the fast-paced Australian business landscape of 2026, managing employee growth requires more than just a tick-box exercise; it requires a deep...
Voice or text coaching built on psychology. For you, your team, or the candidates you place.
A coach that actually gets you.
Get 10 minutes free, then $15 a month. Cancel anytime.
Get Started ≫6 min read
Mathan Allington
Updated on August 19, 2026
Last reviewed August 2026
Good interview feedback is prompt, specific and tied to your selection criteria: name a strength you observed, explain the one factor that drove the decision, and point to something the candidate can act on. Below are copy-ready interview feedback examples for every outcome, from skills-gap rejections to positive feedback and second-round invitations, plus a structure for writing your own.
Four rules cover most of it:
Every example below follows that pattern. Adapt the details, keep the structure.
If you are staring at a blank email, use this five-part structure. It works for a rejection, a progression and an offer, and it keeps you on the right side of your selection criteria.
Keep it under 150 words for a rejection. Longer notes start to read as justification. If you are giving feedback by phone, use the same order and follow up with a short written version so the candidate has something to refer back to.
If you already send a rejection template, paste it into the free rejection email roast, which scores it out of 100, quotes the vague or risky lines back at you and shows the fix.
The most common rejection reason, and the easiest to word badly. "You lack experience" is too vague to help anyone. Name what was missing and how to bridge it:
"We were impressed with your creative campaign ideas. However, for this specific role we require a stronger background in Google Analytics and data-driven reporting. We recommend exploring a certification in these areas to complement your creative strengths."
"Your account management experience came through clearly, and your client examples were strong. The deciding factor was hands-on experience with enterprise contract negotiation, which this role needs from day one. With one or two negotiation cycles under your belt, you would be a genuinely strong candidate for roles like this."
Framing matters: the message shifts from 'you failed' to 'here is how you grow', and it keeps the door open for the candidate to return once they have upskilled. A rejected candidate who received useful feedback might be your perfect hire for a different role next year.
The trickiest feedback to give, because it can feel personal. Frame it around the work environment and what the team needs, never around the individual's personality:
"You clearly have a high level of technical expertise. Our current team structure relies heavily on constant, real-time collaboration and group brainstorming. Based on our discussion, it seems your preferred work style is more suited to an environment that offers more independent, deep-focus autonomy."
"Your standards and attention to detail stood out to everyone on the panel. This role sits in a fast-moving team where priorities shift weekly and decisions often get made with incomplete information. From what you told us about your best work environments, we think a more structured setting would let you do your best work."
Neither example says the candidate is wrong. The environment is a mismatch for their natural style, and saying so honestly helps them find a place where they will actually thrive. Feedback about fit is also far easier to give when it rests on evidence rather than gut feel, which is why mapping your culture and team work personalities with a tool like Compono Engage pays off at rejection time, not just at hiring time.
Sometimes the resume and the fit were fine but the interview itself fell short. This feedback is the most immediately useful kind, because the candidate can apply it next week:
"We really enjoyed hearing about your passion for the industry. One tip for future interviews would be to use the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) to provide more concrete examples of your past successes. With more structured examples, your great experience will really shine through. We wish you the best in your search."
"You built rapport with the panel quickly, which counts for a lot. Where we wanted more was depth: several answers described what your team achieved without making your individual contribution clear. In future interviews, be specific about the decisions you made and the results that followed. Your experience deserves that clarity."
Positive feedback deserves the same specificity as a rejection. "Great interview, well done" is pleasant and useless. Tell candidates what worked, why it mattered for the role, and what the next stage will test.
For a second-round invitation:
"The panel was impressed by your process improvement examples, particularly the invoicing turnaround story. We would like to invite you to a second interview focused on stakeholder management, where we will ask you to talk through a real scenario our team faced last quarter."
"Your technical answers were among the strongest we saw at this stage. The second round pairs you with two engineers from the team for a working session, and we would encourage you to think out loud as you go, since how you collaborate matters as much to us as the answer."
For a successful hire, feedback tells the new starter what to lean on and sets up their first conversation with their manager:
"We are delighted to offer you the role. What stood out was the way you connected our customers' problems to specific product decisions, and the panel felt your collaborative style fits how this team works. Your manager would love to build on that strength in your first quarter."
And for a strong candidate who narrowly missed out, positive feedback is what keeps them warm for the next role:
"You were one of two final candidates and the decision was close. Your stakeholder examples were the best we heard, and the only difference was the other candidate's direct experience with our billing platform. We would genuinely like to talk to you about the next opening on this team, and we will contact you first when it comes up."
Feedback to the candidate is only as good as the evaluation behind it. Interviewers who write "seemed good, would hire" leave the recruiter nothing to feed back and nothing to defend if the decision is questioned. A useful internal evaluation ties each criterion to evidence and a rating. For example, against a criterion of "structured problem solving":
"Rating: meets. Asked how she would approach the reporting backlog; she broke it into data quality, tooling and ownership, and proposed a two-week diagnostic before committing to a fix. Evidence of structure. Did not quantify impact of previous similar work when prompted, so I could not assess scale."
And against "stakeholder influence":
"Rating: below. Two examples given, both described the outcome the team reached rather than what he personally did to move a resistant stakeholder. Follow-up question produced a general answer about 'building relationships'. Not enough evidence for a senior role."
Notice that both notes contain the raw material for candidate feedback: a specific strength, a specific gap, and the evidence for each. Write evaluations this way and the feedback email almost writes itself. If you want more examples of evidence-based feedback language, examples of good feedback covers the same principles inside teams.
Feedback is only as good as the evidence behind it. Standardised selection criteria, applied to every candidate, make gaps easy to identify and safe to communicate, and they protect you from feedback that reflects one interviewer's bias rather than the role's requirements. Compono Hire standardises those criteria and adds work personality assessment to the hiring flow, so when you tell a candidate the deciding factor, you can point to evidence rather than impressions.
Every person who moves through your hiring process is a potential customer, advocate or future employee. The feedback loop is where you decide which one they become. For the surrounding terms (structured interview, selection criteria, candidate experience), the HR glossary has short definitions.
Compono Hire scores every candidate against the same criteria and culture profile, so the deciding factor is on the record before you write the email.
See how it works Talk to usYes, to everyone who invested time in an interview. A short, specific note within 48 hours protects your employer brand and keeps strong candidates warm for future roles. Applicants rejected at the screening stage can receive a briefer standard response.
Within 48 hours of the decision. Speed signals respect, and the details of the interview are still fresh enough for your feedback to be specific.
Name the specific thing that impressed the panel and connect it to the role: for example, "the panel was impressed by your process improvement examples, particularly the invoicing turnaround story", followed by what the next stage will test or what the manager wants to build on.
It can if feedback references personal attributes rather than job-related criteria. Keep every comment tied to the selection criteria and the evidence from the interview, and seek professional advice on your specific obligations if you are unsure.
Avoid vague phrases like "not a fit", comparisons to other candidates, and any comment about personality or personal circumstances. Stick to observed skills, evidence from their answers, and what the role required.

Compono Hire helps you predict job-fit and team-fit using behavioural science, so you can shortlist with confidence.
Request a demoBuilt for mid-market hiring teams.

Voice-first coaching that adapts to your personality. Get actionable steps you can take this week.
Start freeBuilt by Compono. Not therapy — practical behaviour change.
1 min read
In the fast-paced Australian business landscape of 2026, managing employee growth requires more than just a tick-box exercise; it requires a deep...
1 min read
Championing customers isn't about saying "yes" to every request. It's about deeply understanding their needs, building a professional system to track...
1 min read
The most useful tools for building manager skills combine insight into how people work with structured capability development. For HR leaders, seven...