Skip to the main content.
Talk to an expert
Talk to an expert
Featured Offer
Ambitious 50 →
6 months of Hire and Engage free for businesses under 50 people.

Hey Compono!

A coach that actually gets you.

Get 10 minutes free, then $15 a month. Cancel anytime.

Get Started ≫
Free tools for HR leaders

Job
knowledge performance review phrases

24 phrases across four rating bands, for managers, coaching conversations and self-evaluations. Filter, copy, print. Free, no sign-up.

Start with the rating band that matches the person, then pick the voice you are writing in. Copy a phrase, then change the specifics so it names the real project, the real quarter, the real thing that happened. A comment that could describe anyone is the thing you were trying to avoid.

How these were written, and the five steps to a review that holds up ↓
Rating:
Voice:
24 showing
Exceeds expectations

The person others check with before committing, and the checks come back right.

Manager to employee

Keeps current with changes in the field and brings the relevant ones back rather than all of them.

Manager to employee

Knows the limits of their own knowledge and says so plainly.

Manager to employee

Worth capturing what they know. At the moment a lot of it exists only in their head.

Coaching

Ready to set the technical standard for the team rather than meet it.

Coaching

I wrote up [area] because I was the only person who knew it, which was a risk nobody had named.

Self-evaluation
Meets expectations

Knows the work well enough to operate without supervision.

Manager to employee

Keeps skills current as the role changes.

Manager to employee

Asks rather than guessing when something is outside what they know.

Manager to employee

Solid on the current role. The next step is the adjacent area, which is where the next role sits.

Coaching

Worth writing down what only they know. Depth that is not shared is a risk as well as an asset.

Coaching

I closed the gap on [area] this year, which had been slowing me down every time it came up.

Self-evaluation
Needs development

Gaps in core knowledge require regular support from colleagues.

Manager to employee

Has not kept pace with changes to [system or regulation] since it changed in [month].

Manager to employee

Guesses rather than checking, and the guesses are wrong often enough to cost rework.

Manager to employee

Pick the one gap that slows you down weekly and close it properly this quarter. Breadth can wait.

Coaching

When you are unsure, say so and check. Confident wrong answers are far more expensive than questions.

Coaching

I have gaps in [area] that I work around rather than close, and the working around costs more.

Self-evaluation

I have not kept up with the changes to [system], and it shows in how long things take me.

Self-evaluation
Unsatisfactory

Core role knowledge has not reached the required level despite training provided in [month].

Manager to employee

Errors arising from knowledge gaps have required significant rework by colleagues.

Manager to employee

We need a written learning plan with specific areas, dates and how it will be assessed. Reviewed in six weeks.

Coaching

If the training provided did not fit how you learn, say so now rather than repeating it.

Coaching

My knowledge of [area] is not where the role needs it. I want a structured plan rather than picking it up as I go.

Self-evaluation
No phrases match those two filters together. Clear one of them.
How do you write about job knowledge in a performance review?

Rate depth, currency and whether it is shared. Somebody who is the only person who knows something is a strength and a single point of failure.

How these were written

Written, not calculated. Each phrase names a situation, an observable behaviour and its effect on the work or the people around it. Bands run from exceeds expectations to unsatisfactory across three voices: a manager writing about somebody, a manager coaching, and a person writing their own self-evaluation.

Assumptions
  • Phrases are starting points. Drop in the real situation or the comment reads as filler.
  • The four bands assume a four-point scale. On a three or five-point cycle the band is a sorting device, not a score.
  • Written for Australian workplaces and Australian English.
  • Check the constraint before rating the person. Workload, authority and what happened to the last person who tried shape most of what gets written up as an individual failing.
  • Unsatisfactory-band comments assume a dated record already exists and the issue has been raised before.
Sources

What to do about it

Good phrasing rescues a review that was already done properly. It cannot rescue one where nobody wrote anything down until the week it was due.

1

Start from your notes, not from this list

Open what you recorded during the year, pick what really happened, then find the wording. The other order produces a fluent review that says nothing.

2

Name the situation in every comment

The real project, the real quarter, the real result. Only one person could have earned it.

3

Match the band to your evidence, not the conversation you want

A generous rating on somebody you privately consider a problem is how next year's difficult conversation ends up looking like it came from nowhere.

4

Pair every development comment with a support step

Training, a pilot, a pairing, a cadence. Criticism without a path forward produces defensiveness and reads badly to anyone reviewing the file later.

5
Where a tool helps

Read your reviews as a set

If the same competency is the gap across a function, that is a capability gap in how the team was built rather than a dozen development plans.

Being the only one
who knows is a risk.

Compono Develop maps what a role actually requires against what people currently know, so gaps and single points of failure are both visible before they cost anything.

Step 5 asks what your reviews say together. That is very hard to answer from a folder of review documents and straightforward to answer from capability data.

See how it works
Compono Develop
4.7/5
rating across millions of learners

Common questions

What are examples of job knowledge feedback?

Keeping current as a system or regulation changes, knowing the limits of your own knowledge, writing down what only you know.

How do you address a knowledge gap?

Pick the one gap that costs time weekly and close it properly. Breadth can wait; the weekly cost cannot.

Can I use these phrases word for word?

Yes, with the real system or area named.

These phrases are starting points, not finished comments. Change the specifics so each one is true of the actual person and the actual situation, because a comment that could describe anyone is the thing you were trying to avoid. Review comments can later be read as evidence in an employment matter, so anything you take from the unsatisfactory band should match a dated record you already hold. Last reviewed July 2026.

Next step

HR Glossary

Competency framework

The bands above are competency ratings. This is what a competency framework is, and how the levels are meant to work.

Read the definition →Related tool

Skills gap analysis calculator

Reviews name the gap one person at a time. This one sizes it across the team.

Run it next →Buying

Requirements builder

Score the platforms you are looking at against the two risks, must-haves first.

Build the scorecard →Talk to us

Bring us your review cycle

A conversation about what your reviews are telling you as a set, not a demo script.

Talk to us →