Solutions
All Resources
Discover "Me" · Work Personality
THE AI COACH THAT ACTUALLY GETS YOU.
Voice or text coaching built on psychology. For you, your team, or the candidates you place.
Hey Compono!
A coach that actually gets you.
Get 10 minutes free, then $15 a month. Cancel anytime.
Get Started ≫Delegation
performance review phrases
24 phrases across four rating bands, for managers, coaching conversations and self-evaluations. Filter, copy, print. Free, no sign-up.
Start with the rating band that matches the person, then pick the voice you are writing in. Copy a phrase, then change the specifics so it names the real project, the real quarter, the real thing that happened. A comment that could describe anyone is the thing you were trying to avoid.
How these were written, and the five steps to a review that holds up ↓Hands over whole outcomes rather than tasks, with the authority attached.
Manager to employeeLet [name] run [work] and stayed out of it, which is why they can run the next one alone.
Manager to employeeMatches the work to the person's development need, not only to their current capability.
Manager to employeeWorth making the delegation approach explicit to other managers. Most of the team delegates tasks and keeps the thinking.
CoachingReady to delegate something they are genuinely good at, which is the harder version.
CoachingI handed [work] over completely, including the decisions, and resisted stepping in when it was done differently to how I would have.
Self-evaluationDistributes work fairly and checks capacity before assigning.
Manager to employeeGives enough context for the person to make sensible calls without coming back.
Manager to employeeFollows up without hovering.
Manager to employeeDelegates the work well. The next step is delegating the decisions inside it, which is where the development happens.
CoachingWorth asking what you are still holding because it is quicker to do yourself. That list is usually the development plan.
CoachingI started handing over the decisions rather than just the tasks, and the work came back needing less of me.
Self-evaluationDelegates the execution and keeps the judgement, so people do the work without learning the reasoning.
Manager to employeeTakes work back when it is not going as expected rather than coaching through it.
Manager to employeeHolds tasks that others could do, which caps both their capacity and the team's growth.
Manager to employeeNext time you are about to take something back, ask whether the cost is this week or the whole year. Taking it back solves the week.
CoachingPick one thing you are good at and give it away this quarter. Delegating your weaknesses is easy and teaches nobody anything.
CoachingI keep the interesting decisions and delegate the execution, which is not really delegation.
Self-evaluationI take work back too quickly when it is not going the way I would have done it.
Self-evaluationWork that should sit with the team continues to be held personally, and this has been raised before without change.
Manager to employeeTeam members have said they are not given the authority to do the work they are accountable for.
Manager to employeeWe need a written list of what moves to whom and by when, agreed this week and reviewed in six weeks.
CoachingIf the concern is that the team is not ready, that is a capability plan, and I would rather build it than have you absorb the work indefinitely.
CoachingI have held on to work the team should own. I want an agreed handover list rather than deciding case by case.
Self-evaluationAsk what went with the work. A manager who delegates execution and keeps every judgement has distributed effort, not responsibility.
How these were written
Written, not calculated. Each phrase names a situation, an observable behaviour and its effect on the work or the people around it. Bands run from exceeds expectations to unsatisfactory across three voices: a manager writing about somebody, a manager coaching, and a person writing their own self-evaluation.
- Phrases are starting points. Drop in the real situation or the comment reads as filler.
- The four bands assume a four-point scale. On a three or five-point cycle the band is a sorting device, not a score.
- Written for Australian workplaces and Australian English.
- Check the constraint before rating the person. Workload, authority and prior experience shape most of what gets written up as an individual failing.
- Unsatisfactory-band comments assume a dated record already exists and the issue has been raised before.
- Fair Work Ombudsman, Managing underperformance (what a defensible performance record looks like, and why a comment needs a dated example behind it), accessed August 2026
What to do about it
Good phrasing rescues a review that was already done properly. It cannot rescue one where nobody wrote anything down until the week it was due.
Start from your notes, not from this list
Open what you recorded during the year, pick what really happened, then find the wording. The other order produces a fluent review that says nothing.
Name the situation in every comment
The real project, the real quarter, the real result. Only one person could have earned it.
Match the band to your evidence, not the conversation you want
A generous rating on somebody you privately consider a problem is how next year's difficult conversation ends up looking like it came from nowhere.
Pair every development comment with a support step
Training, a pilot, a pairing, a cadence. Criticism without a path forward produces defensiveness and reads badly to anyone reviewing the file later.
Read your reviews as a set
If the same competency is the gap across a function, that is a capability gap in how the team was built rather than a dozen development plans.
Taking it back solves
the week.
Compono Engage reads how a team is actually working, so you can see whether the team is being built or merely being used.
Step 5 asks what your reviews say together. That is very hard to answer from a folder of review documents and straightforward to answer from capability data.
Common questions
What are examples of good delegation?
Handing over a whole outcome with the authority attached, matching work to a development need, resisting the urge to take it back when it is done differently.
How do you help a manager who will not delegate?
Ask what they are holding because it is faster to do themselves. That list is usually the team's development plan, and the cost is annual rather than weekly.
Can I use these phrases word for word?
Yes, with the real handover named.
Next step
Competency framework
The bands above are competency ratings. This is what a competency framework is, and how the levels are meant to work.
Read the definition →Related tooleNPS calculator (employee net promoter score)
Reviews name the gap one person at a time. This one sizes it across the team.
Run it next →BuyingRequirements builder
Score the platforms you are looking at against the two risks, must-haves first.
Build the scorecard →Talk to usBring us your review cycle
A conversation about what your reviews are telling you as a set, not a demo script.
Talk to us →.webp?width=559&height=292&name=2026.07.21%20Fireside%20KV%20-%201200x627%20(event%20featured).webp)
.png?width=383&height=200&name=team%20(1).png)