Skip to the main content.
Free tools for HR leaders

Culture survey questions

24 questions across 12 themes, each with the scale to use. Filter, copy, print. Free, no sign-up.

Pick a theme, then a format. Every question carries the scale to use with it, because a good question on the wrong scale produces data you cannot act on. Copy what you need, then cut the survey down until people will actually finish it.

How these were written, and the five steps to a survey worth running ↓
Theme:
Format:
24 showing
Innovative ↔ Risk Averse

Where does this organisation sit today, between Innovative and Risk Averse?

Sliding or seven-point scale anchored Innovative at one end and Risk Averse at the other. The work environment is dynamic and creative, or controlled and regulated.Rating scale

Where should it sit for us to succeed over the next two years?

Same scale, asked as DESIRED. The gap between current and desired is the finding, not either score alone.Rating scale
Process Driven ↔ Outcomes Driven

Where does this organisation sit today, between Process Driven and Outcomes Driven?

Sliding or seven-point scale anchored Process Driven at one end and Outcomes Driven at the other. Performing work in the correct manner, or achieving results even if shortcuts are taken.Rating scale

Where should it sit for us to succeed over the next two years?

Same scale, asked as DESIRED. The gap between current and desired is the finding, not either score alone.Rating scale
Task Centered ↔ People Centered

Where does this organisation sit today, between Task Centered and People Centered?

Sliding or seven-point scale anchored Task Centered at one end and People Centered at the other. Task accomplishment is emphasised, or employee social and personal needs are valued.Rating scale

Where should it sit for us to succeed over the next two years?

Same scale, asked as DESIRED. The gap between current and desired is the finding, not either score alone.Rating scale
Collectivist ↔ Individualist

Where does this organisation sit today, between Collectivist and Individualist?

Sliding or seven-point scale anchored Collectivist at one end and Individualist at the other. Emphasising team achievements, or recognising individual accomplishments.Rating scale

Where should it sit for us to succeed over the next two years?

Same scale, asked as DESIRED. The gap between current and desired is the finding, not either score alone.Rating scale
Centralised Control ↔ Delegated Control

Where does this organisation sit today, between Centralised Control and Delegated Control?

Sliding or seven-point scale anchored Centralised Control at one end and Delegated Control at the other. Decision-making restricted to leadership, or empowering all employees.Rating scale

Where should it sit for us to succeed over the next two years?

Same scale, asked as DESIRED. The gap between current and desired is the finding, not either score alone.Rating scale
Hierarchical Structure ↔ Flat Structure

Where does this organisation sit today, between Hierarchical Structure and Flat Structure?

Sliding or seven-point scale anchored Hierarchical Structure at one end and Flat Structure at the other. Many formal layers of management, or a minimal, flatter hierarchy.Rating scale

Where should it sit for us to succeed over the next two years?

Same scale, asked as DESIRED. The gap between current and desired is the finding, not either score alone.Rating scale
Responsive ↔ Planned

Where does this organisation sit today, between Responsive and Planned?

Sliding or seven-point scale anchored Responsive at one end and Planned at the other. Reacting to immediate challenges, or prioritising long-term strategic goals.Rating scale

Where should it sit for us to succeed over the next two years?

Same scale, asked as DESIRED. The gap between current and desired is the finding, not either score alone.Rating scale
Conformity ↔ Individuality

Where does this organisation sit today, between Conformity and Individuality?

Sliding or seven-point scale anchored Conformity at one end and Individuality at the other. Following defined norms, or allowing personal freedom.Rating scale

Where should it sit for us to succeed over the next two years?

Same scale, asked as DESIRED. The gap between current and desired is the finding, not either score alone.Rating scale
Accepting ↔ Questioning

Where does this organisation sit today, between Accepting and Questioning?

Sliding or seven-point scale anchored Accepting at one end and Questioning at the other. Compliance with directives, or encouraging employees to challenge management.Rating scale

Where should it sit for us to succeed over the next two years?

Same scale, asked as DESIRED. The gap between current and desired is the finding, not either score alone.Rating scale
Cooperation ↔ Competition

Where does this organisation sit today, between Cooperation and Competition?

Sliding or seven-point scale anchored Cooperation at one end and Competition at the other. Promoting collaboration, or fostering internal competition.Rating scale

Where should it sit for us to succeed over the next two years?

Same scale, asked as DESIRED. The gap between current and desired is the finding, not either score alone.Rating scale
Customer Focused ↔ Internal Effectiveness

Where does this organisation sit today, between Customer Focused and Internal Effectiveness?

Sliding or seven-point scale anchored Customer Focused at one end and Internal Effectiveness at the other. Prioritising customer satisfaction, or improving internal processes.Rating scale

Where should it sit for us to succeed over the next two years?

Same scale, asked as DESIRED. The gap between current and desired is the finding, not either score alone.Rating scale
Formal ↔ Informal

Where does this organisation sit today, between Formal and Informal?

Sliding or seven-point scale anchored Formal at one end and Informal at the other. Operating with many rigid policies, or working with more flexible guidelines.Rating scale

Where should it sit for us to succeed over the next two years?

Same scale, asked as DESIRED. The gap between current and desired is the finding, not either score alone.Rating scale
No questions match those two filters together. Clear one of them.
You have the questions

Running the survey
is the easy half.

Copy every question on this page and run it yourself. What a spreadsheet of responses cannot do is measure the result against a validated model, or cut it by team, location, job level and function until the subcultures behind the score show up.

Compono Engage · Work personalityDivision = Delivery Team
The Evaluator – 43%1EPThe Coordinator – 65%1TRThe Doer – 87%8AAMRRCAJJJGDFTEBThe Auditor – 82%6IMLAAAIWEBERThe Helper – 57%2SWKPThe Advisor – 35%1DNThe Pioneer – 13%0The Campaigner – 18%0Personalitywheel
The eight ways of work a team needs covered, shaded by how strongly this team prefers each. Deep Doer and Auditor coverage, nobody in Pioneer or Campaigner. That is why this team asks for more innovation and then struggles to deliver it, and it is not something the survey answers alone can tell you.
Compono Engage · Culture alignment12 dimensions
Innovative
Risk Averse
Responsive
Planned
Customer Focused
Internal Effectiveness
Centralised Control
Delegated Control
Current cultureDesired culture4 of 12 shown
Every dimension measured as current against desired, on a scale that has been validated rather than invented. The gap is the finding, and it is the thing a single culture score can never give you.
Compono Engage · SubculturesBy division
InnovativeProcessTaskCollectivistControlStructureResponsiveConformityAcceptingCooperationCustomerFormal
Whole organisation (27)
Customer Service Team (12)
Executive (1)
HR and Finance (2)
Widget Delivery Team (12)
AlignedMisaligned
The same 12 dimensions cut by division, function, location or job level. The whole-organisation row hides what the Executive row shows. Averages are where culture problems go to hide.
See how Engage measures itValidated model, 12 dimensions, sliced by team, function, location and job level.
What questions should a culture survey ask?

Ask about position rather than quality. Not whether the culture is good, but where it sits between two things and where it should sit. The gap between those is what you can act on.

How these were written

Nothing here is calculated. Each question is written against two tests: can somebody answer it honestly, and can you act on the answer. Each one carries the scale it should be asked on, because the scale is part of the question and mixing scales inside a survey makes results much harder to compare. Filter by theme to cut whole sections rather than trimming words, and by format to balance rating questions against open text.

Assumptions
  • These are a starting point, not a survey. Cut hard. Response rate falls with every question you add.
  • Scales are part of the question. Five-point agreement for most, frequency for behaviour. Pick one convention and hold it.
  • Anonymity has to be explained, not asserted. People assume the worst when you are vague, and it shows up in the answers.
  • Written for Australian workplaces and Australian English. Compono product terms are reproduced exactly as they appear in the platform.
  • Do not ask more often than you can act. Asking without visible follow-through does more damage than not asking at all.

What to do about it

Most survey problems are not question problems. They are what-happens-next problems, and people can tell the difference by the second round.

1

Decide what you will do with the answers before you ask

If no decision is waiting on the result, do not run it. An unused survey teaches people not to answer the next one.

2

Cut it until it hurts

Remove whole themes rather than trimming words. Eight sharp questions beat forty thorough ones nobody finishes.

3

Say how anonymity actually works

Who sees what, at what group size, and what happens to free text. Vagueness reads as surveillance.

4

Report back before you fix anything

Tell people what you heard, including the uncomfortable parts, within two weeks. This is the single biggest driver of next year's response rate.

5
Where a tool helps

Pick one thing and visibly change it

One change people can see beats five they cannot. The point of a survey is the change, not the score.

One score tells you
almost nothing.

Compono Engage measures all 12 dimensions as current versus desired, then reads them alongside climate and work personality, which is what turns a gap into a recommendation you can defend.

Step 5 is where most survey programs stall: the score arrives and nobody agrees what it means. That is an interpretation problem, and interpretation is what the platform is for.

See how it works
Compono Engage
8%+
reduction in turnover

Common questions

What are the 12 culture dimensions?

Innovative to Risk Averse, Process Driven to Outcomes Driven, Task Centered to People Centered, Collectivist to Individualist, Centralised Control to Delegated Control, Hierarchical Structure to Flat Structure, Responsive to Planned, Conformity to Individuality, Accepting to Questioning, Cooperation to Competition, Customer Focused to Internal Effectiveness, and Formal to Informal.

What is the difference between culture and engagement?

Engagement is how people feel about working here. Culture is how work actually gets done. You can have high engagement inside a culture that will not deliver the strategy.

Why ask current and desired separately?

Because a single score is unreadable. Knowing a team sits at 6 on innovation means nothing. Knowing they sit at 6 and want 8 is a direction.

Can we run this ourselves?

Yes, these questions are free to use. Interpreting a 12-dimension gap across teams is the harder part, and that is what the platform is for.

These questions are a starting point, not a survey. Cut hard: response rates fall with every extra question, and a short survey people finish beats a thorough one they abandon. Say what you will do with the answers before you ask, and be honest about how anonymity actually works, because people assume the worst when you are vague. Last reviewed July 2026.