Pay transparency
laws (US)

What the laws require, roughly grouped

The strongest form requires good-faith salary ranges (and often benefits summaries) in every posting, pioneered by Colorado and now the norm across the major coastal markets. Weaker forms require disclosure on request or at offer stage. Several states add pay-data reporting to regulators, and remote-role postings reachable from a covered state are commonly in scope, which in practice pushes national employers to publish ranges everywhere rather than maintain state-by-state posting logic.

Why compliance is the smaller half of the work

A posted range is a public statement about your pay structure, and candidates and current employees read it as one. Ranges wide enough to be meaningless invite regulator and applicant scepticism; honest ranges expose internal compression immediately, because incumbents can read the posting too. Employers that treat transparency laws as a formatting requirement get the awkward conversations without the benefit; those that fix pay architecture first get cheaper offers, faster acceptances and fewer equity claims.

The wider trend, not just the US one

The same direction is visible across this glossary's countries: Ontario's job-posting rules from January 2026, British Columbia's posting requirements since 2023, and the EU's transparency directive reshaping European hiring by June 2026. Pay secrecy as a compensation strategy is ending across the developed world at roughly the same time; the US version is simply arriving state by state rather than nationally.